★ Grassroots Network of, by & for Centrist Independent & Moderate Voters ★

By far the most widely supported healthcare reform plan among the American people – centrists included – is the so-called ‘public option’. Poll after poll over the last decade has shown the highest level of support for it, vs other healthcare reform options – especially when the survey describes what it means, as many don’t know the difference between ideas floated by politicians by just their names.

Surveys where those polled were told that the public option gave people the choice between government and private insurance plans have shown support above 70%, with some upwards of 80%. Contrast this with recent GOP plans, which polled in the 20% to the low 30’s range, and the ‘single payer’ plan from the left that would forcing everyone to be on the same government plan without any competition in the 40’s.

Regardless of what you choose for yourself, nobody should be able to make these choices for other people, and having private plans competing with the government may lead to innovation that wouldn’t happen with a government monopoly.

While there are other avenues of corruption, one of the ways that you can measure it’s dark influence on our politics to at least a significant degree is by where a campaign or organization gets their funding. This is only possible if campaigns and organizations doing work in politics reveal their donor information.

This is one of a handful of issues that not only centrists and moderates support, but also the vast majority across the political spectrum. Few issues can be fairly labeled this way, but this is a ‘transpartisan’ stance – it transcends typical partisan lines.

Regardless of what the Supreme Court says about donation limits, we can at least push for legislation that requires complete transparency. So-called ‘dark money groups’ / 501(c)4 organizations and Super PACs that can hide their donor information should be illegal and forced to reveal all of their donors, as should any organization that spends a penny on political activity, which is why we will not take funding from these sorts of organizations, even though we legally can.

Dark money groups are a corrupt, non-transparent form of advocacy organization (the legal status is called ‘501(c)(4)’) that allows political operatives to accept unlimited amounts of money, without even the government knowing who those donors are – and yes, that means foreign donors can buy influence in American elections.

Groups like the NRA, Bernie Sanders’ left wing ‘Our Revolution’, the hard right Club for Growth and even some centrist to moderate orgs like No Labels and the Centrist Project / Unite America choose this form of organization so they can hide their donors from the American people – this should be illegal.

Dark money can also directly corrupt politicians through a practice called ‘bundling’ – where people pool smaller donations to candidate campaigns to – perfectly legally – buy influence with donations far larger than individuals can give. Both major parties are bought and paid for with money like this – it’s up to centrists, and transpartisan reformers across the spectrum, to unite and cut out these roots of corruption.

Most independent centrists, and many on the left and right who aren’t blindly partisan, agree that people who work in public service shouldn’t be able to turn around and make millions by using the contacts they’ve made during their time supposedly representing the American people (as elected officials or their staff) to make a killing corrupting the system later, lobbying for special interests.

Enacting a lifetime ban on working for any organization that spends a penny on political lobbying would significantly undercut one of the biggest sources of political corruption. If coupled with another reform most centrists, Democrats and Republicans also support (term limits), it would improve the entire political landscape.

By stopping career politicians from staying in safe seats indefinitely, and ending how the revolving door further corrupts staff and politicians, we’d significantly undercut two of the biggest root causes of corruption in Washington. These aren’t silver bullets, but together they’d make a very real dent in our nation’s corrupt two-party system.

A generation ago, a bipartisan effort between reasonable Democrats and Republicans passed responsible legislation to prepare for the demographic tidal wave we are only now seeing. This demographic wave stems from Baby Boomers retiring, leading to fewer people than ever paying into the system for each retiree drawing benefits from Social Security and Medicare.

The two major parties are going the grossly irresponsible polar opposite direction of what we need them to do – stealing from future generations instead of making small, forward-thinking sacrifices now to prevent much larger problems in the future.

There are no shortage of ideas on how to solve this problem – to get us over the hump of the Baby Boomers retiring, but the fact is it’s going to take not only a less partisan, moderate angle to make this work, but also people willing to ask for people to sacrifice for the future, up against corrupt Democrats and Republicans more than happy to lie and keep giving more than they tax – making the problem even worse.

Intelligent centrist immigration policy couples the compassionate thing to do with a focus on what’s best for the American economy. We should never punish children for the mistakes of their guardians, so as far as DACA is concerned, we shouldn’t abandon law-abiding youth who choose to stay and earn citizenship – we should encourage them to stay, mitigating demographic issues behind our social safety net problems.

Some ideas, like having a separate path to citizenship for those that create jobs in the American economy, are an economic win-win and should be open to as many people as want to come in. No matter how well the economy is doing, this sort of immigration is helpful, and should never be limited – more the economically merrier.

Others, like the amount of low-skilled immigrants allowed in per year, shouldn’t be something that is arbitrarily set (as it largely is now). Instead, the number should be pegged to the need of the economy at the time, so more are allowed during boom periods, and less during recessions.

Unlike blind partisan ideologues, who make exceptions for those who use rights in ways their belief systems disagree with (if they respect your rights to begin with), we respect the right to speech, bear arms, free association, assembly, voting and other individual rights, no matter who you are or whether you agree with us or not.

The principle of ‘Equal Justice Under Law’ is so core to our system of government that it is literally carved into stone over the Supreme Court building. Much like our anti-corruption stance, this principle should transcend left, right and centrist, but a growing number of hyper-partisan voters believes that certain rights should be selectively applied to favored or opposing political factions.

Other related ideas supported by most centrists include legalizing or decriminalizing marijuana sales, certain forms of alternative punishment for minor and nonviolent crimes shown to lower crime, education reform and fair tax reform without so many loopholes.

Subscribe to Our Weekly Blog Digest & Updates



HIGH CENTRIST DEFINITION COLUMN

All HCD Posts

Owl looking askew - for post on Modern Whig Party and national centrist party stategy
I don’t talk about this much because, well – I don’t see the point in beating a horse that is not only dead, but has been dead for nearly 170 years, as the Whig Party has been. But one of the Modern Whig Party’s most active proponents asked, and it tied in with in a

Dissecting Centrist Stereotypes in WSJ Op-Ed Blaming Moderates for Problems Ideologues Cause

I don’t read the Journal, save for a rare link that comes across my feed – like this one. I’ve heard that it’s gotten worse over the last few years, so maybe this isn’t as far from their norm as it seems like it should be, but when someone sends you an article, ostensibly about

Dissecting Centrist Stereotypes in WSJ Op-Ed Blaming Moderates for Problems Ideologues Cause

GOP Tax Bill Vote Illustrates Why Centrist Fulcrum Needs to Be More Than a Few Votes to Work Consistently

The idea that a few independent centrists in the US Senate could block the worst hyper-partisan legislation is a great medium-term goal, and should work sometimes. Ultimately though, we need more than just a few votes – especially if we want it to do more than just stonewall the worst legislation or be a ‘caucus

GOP Tax Bill Vote Illustrates Why Centrist Fulcrum Needs to Be More Than a Few Votes to Work Consistently

Susan Collins Holding the Line in Senate for Centrists While Trump Failures Help Undercut Two-Party System

The last decade has been an unmitigated disaster for centrists and moderates on both sides. For every Angus King, Susan Collins and Joe Manchin, there has been a dozen Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz’. As the two major parties abandoned us and created a vacuum, the political center in the U.S. has been in disarray.

Susan Collins Holding the Line in Senate for Centrists While Trump Failures Help Undercut Two-Party System

THE CENTRIST DEFINITION PODCAST

Subscribe

UNITERS CENTRIST VIDEOS

Channel

Banner asking for centrist & moderate bloggers

FEATURED CENTRIST BLOG POSTS

All Featured Posts

Transpartisan Trophy: Senator Kennedy for Critique of Ridiculous Trump Court Nominee

First in our new series aiming to highlight and commend partisan figures who rise above partisan pressure to do the right thing, our inaugural Transpartisan Trophy goes to Louisiana Republican Senator John Neely Kennedy, for fairly and directly highlighting the inadequate qualifications of a Trump court nominee. Kennedy’s Transpartisan Trial for Peterson A great way

Transpartisan Trophy: Senator Kennedy for Critique of Ridiculous Trump Court Nominee

Argument for Term Limits Bolstered by Mounting Scientific Evidence

The argument for term limits is one of those rare cases that you can accurately apply the label of ‘transpartisan’. For as long as I can remember, since I began engaging in political activity in the late ’90s, polls have shown a super-majority of US citizens – myself very much included – support this idea,

Argument for Term Limits Bolstered by Mounting Scientific Evidence

One Bipartisan Act Doesn’t Make Trump a Centrist or Independent

None of us can do much more than speculate over what President Trump’s motivations were for siding with Democrats over the short term debt ceiling deal, but we can say that doing so doesn’t magically make him an independent (much less a centrist), no matter how many absurd articles claim otherwise. Trump is a Nontraditional

One Bipartisan Act Doesn’t Make Trump a Centrist or Independent

Fact Check: Sanders’ Single Payer Adds Over a TRILLION to the National Debt Every Year

Left wing Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to release legislation based on his ‘single payer’, socialized healthcare plan soon, which means it’s time to revisit the false claims he made about it during the his presidential campaign against Hillary Clinton, and especially the huge gap between the reality of how much it would cost,

Fact Check: Sanders’ Single Payer Adds Over a TRILLION to the National Debt Every Year

Beta Launch & Open Call to Centrist & Moderate Bloggers

After a few years dormant, we are re-launching and putting out an open call to centrist & moderate voices across America to join our open community. Help us build a network of people who will put their money where their mouths are to build a network of centrists & moderates across the nation, aimed at

Beta Launch & Open Call to Centrist & Moderate Bloggers

A “Rebellion in the Middle” is Emerging – Independent Centrist Groundswell is Growing

I was just thinking to myself just now that this is a great week to start a blog that will be tracking the ‘rise of the center’ (I should name something after that… wait…) of American politics, with all that has been coming out about centrist independents and moderates, but as I wrote those words just

A “Rebellion in the Middle” is Emerging – Independent Centrist Groundswell is Growing

QUOTES TO SHARE

Centrist Quotes

VIDEOS FROM OTHER UNITERS

Playlists

PROMOTED CENTRIST COMMUNITY BLOG POSTS

All Promoted Posts

How to Make Your New Centrish Party Succeed in Two Easy Steps

It’s Third Party Season! With the 2018 mid-terms and 2020 presidential elections far enough in the future that candidates are not yet locked in, third party hopes spring eternal in the centrist breast. A hope that there just might be a viable alternative to the usual Republican and Democratic choices they find so disheartening. A

How to Make Your New Centrish Party Succeed in Two Easy Steps

2018 Midterm Election – Blue Waves, House Rules and The O’Neill Exception

Outside of the Mueller investigation, the biggest political question of 2018 is whether Democrats can ride a widely anticipated Blue Wave into a majority in Congress and divide the government. There are similarities to the mid-term wave elections that flipped Congress in 2006 and 2010. Many compare the stunning Senate special election victory of Democrat

2018 Midterm Election – Blue Waves, House Rules and The O’Neill Exception

Roy Moore’s Comments on Amendments Broke His Oath to Alabama & God

Amending our Constitution is very difficult (as it should be), but 17 Amendments have been ratified since the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791. Some of them are rather integral to our democracy, and valued across the political spectrum, but apparently Roy Moore thinks getting rid of all 17 would “eliminate many problems”. Moore’s

Roy Moore’s Comments on Amendments Broke His Oath to Alabama & God

  •  
    137
    Shares
  • 111
  • 20
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • 6